4. Influence of the heating on the attractive force of a magnetic attachment

-Part 2. Study of Denture Based Resin Curing-

 

Miyata T., Nakamura Y., Niimi J., Ando A., Shouji k., Imaoka S., Ohno Y., and Tanaka Y.

Removable Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry , Aichi-Gakuin University

 

Introduction

 

A magnetic attachment has achieved excellent clinical results, and has been recognized as a useful tool with numerous advantages compared with a conventional mechanical retainers1-3).

A Neodymium (Nd) magnet, recently available on the market, has a reported characteristic the temperature-related of magnetic force loss at low relative temperatures.  This is considered as one disadvantage of a Nd magnet use.

The clinical use conditions including the effect of temperature relationship and laboratory processing should be evaluated.

 

Objective

 

We investigated the influence of the difference in curing methods and thickness of denture-base resin on the attractive force of a magnetic attachment on the assumption that magnetic assemblies were incorporated into the work model during polymerization temperatures.

 

Materials and Methods

 

1)      Materials

Specified magnetic assemblies and keepers were used as samples in this study (GIGAUSS D 600 (GC) and PHYSIO MAGNET 35 (Hitachi Metals)).  Five samples for each product were evaluated(Fig. 1).

Fig. 1: Magnetic attachments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


2)      Methods

The influence of two different resin curing protocols were tested on magnetic attachment attractive force: 1. microwave curing method and 2.wet heat curing method.

Resin curing protocol with magnetic attachments followed the following techniques.  Microwave technique resins were cured in a specified microwave oven at 500 watts for 3 minutes.  Wet heat resin curing protocol were cured at 70°C for 60 minutes, and then 100°C for 30 minutes, followed by cooling at room temperature for 24 hours.  Following use of either curing method, tested magnetic assemblies were removed from resin samples, and attractive force was measured.  Attractive forces before and after polymerization for each curing method were compared to investigate the influence of polymerization on the attractive force.  We also investigated the change in the attractive force for 3 different resin thicknesses.

3)      Sample preparation

Molded paraffin wax was invested in a flask using ADVASTONE (GC) based on the conventional method, followed by wax elimination.  A magnetic assembly was adhesively stablized with alpha-cyanoacrylate adhesive (Aron Alpha) into the space created by wax elimination.  Acron MC Live Pink no. 8 was packed into a flask in the rapid heat cure method, and Acron Live Pink no. 8 was packed in the wet heat cure method.  A magnetic assembly was removed from the resin plate after polymerization, and used as a sample (Fig. 2).  Resin plate samples were 35 x 60 mm in width, and 5, 10, and 15 mm in thickness (Fig. 3).

 

Fig. 2: Process of sample fabrication

 

 

Fig. 3: Resin plate size

size

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


4)       Attractive force measurement

Attractive force measurement was conducted using EZ test, compact tabletop material tester, with a 5 kgf load cell and 5 mm/min crosshead speed.  Attractive force was measured 10 times for each magnetic assembly, and the average was taken as a result.  Attractive forces before and after each experiment were compared. The custom made jig devised in our department was used to accurately measure the attractive force (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4: Measuring device and custom made jig

 

 

 

 


Results

 

In the rapid heat cure method, magnetic attraction forces decreased with both in GIGAUSS D 600 and PHYSIO MAGNET 35 after completion of polymerization procedures.  The evaluation of resin thickness on the attraction forces demonstrated a decrease in measured attraction force with the resin plate thickness of 10 mm compared to a 5mm sample.  No significant difference was found for the 10 and 15 mm samples (Fig. 5).

The wet heat curing method showed similar results as the rapid heat curing method regarding the influence of curing methods and resin thickness (Fig. 6).

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


Discussion

 

The present study was performed on the basis that magnetic assemblies are incorporated into working models during higher polymerization temperatures.  Magnetic assemblies were directly bonded with a heat-curing resin.  Since this method does not require autopolymerized quick cure resin, it offers advantages such as improved mucosal surface denture esthetics, and improved adhesive attachment between a magnetic assembly and resin. Dentures made using this procedure offer several advantages and improved physical properties with greater material stability.

The influence of polymerization on the resulting magnetic attachment attractive force properties is significant.  Attraction forces decreased both with the rapid heat curing method and wet heat curing method after polymerization. This finding suggests a significant heat-related material changes after polymerization. 

The magnetic attachment attraction forces are also affected by enclosing denture resin base thickness. Further investigation in the relationships of heating on the magnetic assembly units is recommended.  The mechanisms of heat generation and polymerization on the attractive force are not clearly understood.  It is also unclear as to the influence of electromagnetic microwave generation on magnetic assemblies and metal components.

 

Conclusion

 

 The influence of two different denture resin curing protocols of the denture base resin, and the effect of resin thickness on the attraction force was evaluated.

1.Both the microwave and wet heat curing methods showed a decrease in the attraction force after polymerization.

2.The attractive force decreased by 4% in a resin plate 5 mm in thickness, and by 10% in a resin plate 10 mm in thickness.  No difference was found between resins 10 and 15 mm in thickness.

3.No significant difference in the attractive force of a magnetic assembly was found between rapid and wet heat resin curing techniques.

 

Reference

1. Jackson,T.R.: The application of rare earth magnetic retention toosseointegrated implants. Int. J. Oral Maxill. Imp., 1: 81-92, 1986.

2. Tanaka, Y.: Dental Magnetic Attachment, QA, Ishiyaku Publishers, Inc.(Tokyo),1995.

3. Nakamura, K. Hiroshi, M. Fukazawa, N. and et al: Influence of Heat Treatments on Attractive Force of Magnetic Attachments. J J Mag Dent. 6: 63-70, 1997.