Effect of argon
shielding on strength of cast Fe-Pt magnetic alloy laser-welded to Co-Cr alloy
Naoki Baba1,
Ikuya Watanabe2, Yasuhiro Tanaka1
Kunihiro Hisatsune1,
Mitsuru Atsuta1
1 Department of
Developmental and Reconstructive Medicine
Nagasaki
2 Department of
Biomaterials Science, Baylor College of Dentistry
Introduction
Iron-Platinum (Fe-Pt)
alloys have soft and hard magnetic properties and excellent corrosion
resistance compared to the stainless steal which is usually used for a
Materials
& Methods
Cast plates (0.5 x 3.0 x
10 mm) were prepared with a custom made Fe-Pt alloy (Fe-36at%Pt) and a commercial
Co-Cr alloy (Vitallium, Austenal). After the cast Fe-Pt plates were sealed in an evacuated silica tube, they were heat-treated,at 1325 °C for 45 minutes, then quenched in ice water.
They were butted against cast Co-Cr plates and then bilaterally laser-welded
using Nd:YAG laser (Neolaser L, Girrbach
Dental Systems,
Results
Fig. 1. Fracture force of the specimens
Fig. 2. Elongation of the specimens
Fig. 3. SEM photographs of entire fracture surfaces. A:
Control Co-Cr alloy specimen, B: Control Fe-Pt alloy specimen; C: Laser-welded
Co-Cr specimen with Ar; D: Laser-welded Co-Cr
specimen without Ar; E: Laser-welded Fe-Pt specimen
with Ar; F: Laser-welded Fe-Pt specimen without Ar; G: Fe-Pt laser-welded to Co-Cr specimen with Ar; H: Fe-Pt laser-welded to Co-Cr specimen without Ar.
Fig. 4. SEM micrographs of fracture
surfaces. A: Control Co-Cr alloy specimen; B: Control Fe-Pt alloy
specimen (near surface of specimen); C: Control Fe-Pt alloy specimen (interior
region of specimen); D: Laser-welded Co-Cr specimen without Ar;
E: Laser-welded Fe-Pt specimen with Ar; F: Fe-Pt
laser-welded to Co-Cr specimen with Ar; G: Fe-Pt
laser-welded to Co-Cr specimen without Ar; H: Fe-Pt
laser-welded to Co-Cr specimen without Ar.
Discussion
Fracture surface of
laser-welded Co-Cr without Ar shielding showed deeper
penetration depth than laser-welded Co-Cr alloy with Ar
shielding and welded area covered almost whole of cross section area (Figs. 3,
C and D). Therefore laser-welded Co-Cr alloy without Ar
shielding has higher failure force than laser-welded Co-Cr alloy with Ar shielding and equivalent value for control Co-Cr alloy.
Control Fe-Pt alloy
exhibited higher Ff value followed by control Co-Cr alloy and laser-welded
Co-Cr alloy without Ar shielding and the highest
elongation. Fracture surface of control Fe-Pt alloy showed equiaxial
dimple fracture near surface region (Fig. 3, B and 4, B). It indicated ductile
fracture. Despite center region of plate has more brittle fracture and large
crack (Figs. 3, B and 4, C). It might be caused by different cooling rate
during the casting. Solidification of alloy started from surface region toward
to the center of plate because of lower temperature of mold compared to the
molten alloy. Center region of molten alloy solidified finally then micro-shrinkage
is concentrated and crack was made. Moreover several porosities were observed
at near surface region. These casting defects cause reduction of Fe-Pt alloy
strength.
Some cracks which might
be created during the laser-welding were observed on fracture surface of both
laser-welded Fe-Pt alloys (Figs 3, E and F). After
welding, the solidification of the molten Fe-Pt alloy occurs quickly. This
rapid solidification causes a constriction of the welded region at the same
time. Thus, a concentration of stress occurs at the laser-welded region, and
the cracks are created. These cracks might reduce the joint strength of
laser-welded Fe-Pt alloy. Both laser-welded Fe-Pt alloys displayed more
brittle fracture surface with river pattern (Fig. 4, E)
compared to the fracture surface of the control specimens due to the difference
in the solidification modes between the laser-welded and the control specimens.
The laser-welded specimens quickly solidified compared to the control
specimens. It might affect a microstructure and order of Fe and Pt atom, and
cause reduction of joint strength.
Fe-Pt
welded Co-Cr showed a mixture of brittle and ductile fractures (Figs. 3, G and
H). Some region has equiaxial dimple fracture like
the control Fe-Pt alloy (Fig. 4, F). Brittle fracture regions were similar to
the laser-welded Co-Cr alloy and control Fe-Pt alloy. This fracture surfaces
reflect that the
Ff value of the welded Fe-Pt/Co-Cr fell into the middle of homogeneously welded
Fe-Pt (lowest) and Co-Cr (highest) alloys.
Several welding defects, such as cracks, solidification shrinkage
on the surface and porosities which caused incorporation of surrounding gas,
were observed on fracture surface.
During
the welding, atoms which consist of both Fe-Pt and Co-Cr alloy were diffused in
the weld pool. This diffusion may cause formation of intermetallic compounds (CoPt, CoFe and etc.) in welded
region. Theses intermetallic compounds are thought to
affect joint strength however further research needs this point.
Argon
shielding did not affect joint strength of laser-welded Fe-Pt alloy and Fe-Pt
alloy welded to Co-Cr alloy since penetration depth is sufficient to cover the
cross section of sample under both shielding condition. Even though welding
area covered whole cross section of laser-welded Fe-Pt alloy with and without
Ar, they have only 12~14% Ff value of control Fe-Pt
alloy compared to the Co-Cr alloy. It may cause different microstructure and
the difference how much heat influences the mechanical properties during the
welding.
Joint
strength of Fe-Pt alloy welded to Co-Cr alloy is lower than control Fe-Pt and
Co-Cr alloy. Hence, it is necessary to have a sufficient welding area around
Fe-Pt alloy to function when Fe-Pt alloy is required to connect with Co-Cr
alloy in clinical situation.