[JSMAD Home] [Program] [Abstract]

Paper ID S002 : Influence of magnetic attachment for implant on MRI scan


Posted Messages (Last post: Mon Mar 16 07:19:49 2020)
[0001] [0002] [0003] 
[Go to Form]

[0001]
Yukyo Takada (Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry )

I evaluate this presentation clinically as an important and practical study.

You have concluded that replacement of the keeper on the implant to the healing abutment during MRI scan would be necessary. Although I agree with you in the case of getting a MRI image near the implant, is that necessary throughout the area of the head? For example, when diagnosing the brain, what do you think about the area damaged by the artifact in the case of Magfit IP, which has the largest artifact in this study?

[0002]
Ryota Maruo (Tsurumi University School of Dental Medicine )

Thank you for your question.
In the most cases, there is little effect on diagnosis using MRI images. However, when using Magfit IP in the upper molars regious may have an effect on the diagnosis of a part of the brain, such as the brainstem or cerebellum. thus, Magfit IP would be necessary to remove from the implant if possible.

[0003]
Yukyo Takada (Tohoku University Graduate School of Dentistry )

Thank you so much for the important answer.

This bulletin board is opened from February 28th, 2020 to March 17th, 2020.